Was it necessary to get a flu shot? At work, do they have the right?
Answers:
OLGA
For a long time, article 33 of the Law on the Protection of Citizens on the right to refuse medical intervention (from July 22, 1993 N5487-1), Article 5 of Federal Law No. 157 (on the right to refuse preventive vaccinations).
I and most of my acquaintances have long written Refusals to children and myself. And if suddenly in school, a garden or at work they will force - demand explanations in writing - and in Office of Public Prosecutor. So far, the intervention of the prosecutor was not required in Russia.
By the way, even physicians now Rospotrebnadzor can not force, law-abiding officials prefer to observe laws and the Constitution.
The form of refusals is on the website www.privivkam.net, in the same place on the forums such information that many supporters of vaccination cease to be so - just statistics and just facts.
This is harm from flu shots: Comed Files prove that Thimerosal-containing flu shots lead to a miscarriage http://www.privivkam.net/iv/viewtopic.p... & start = 135
There is also a link: William Engdahl: Bill Gates on the "vaccine for population reduction"
http://oko-planet.su/politik/politiklis ...- dlya.html
About 15 years ago, it was easier to "buy" a certificate of support, and now the laws were made
Yuliya
Nonsense all this - on have the right.
Katya Yesenin
Vaccinations are done on a voluntary basis! Have no right to force
Nurzhan Turdaliev
this is a voluntary matter
Lenchik
looking in what sphere you are working - doctors are being forced - the highest-ranking doctor of medicine makes himself. but as practice shows, they do not save a flu from a flu, especially when everyone is sick all the time (
Irishka
voluntarily
Oksa
We always have everything voluntarily - forced! but you should know that the effect of vaccination is only 15% and the risk of getting complications is also present ((
Kostas
no one can force, can refuse in writing, say that you are allergic and all will be left behind once and for all
Tatyana Sedova
force - do not have the right. According to statistics, 83 percent of those vaccinated against influenza in the past year, fell ill with this very flu. The reason is simple: to be vaccinated effectively, a person must be absolutely healthy. no slightest rhinitis, no scratching in the throat, no inflammation in the body, including a sick tooth. who is waving at it - there is no sense to inculcate, even harmful, because you will get sick in any way.
Svetlana Mosolova (Gornostayeva)
They do not have to force you. I never do
Olga @
If you have never been ill with the flu, then it is not recommended to vaccinate.
Alexander Aleshin
It's worth it. If you work with people, management has the right to pressure.
Zefir
It depends on where you work. If in a "private" organization, it is better to do, but you can forget about "rights". And then everything can end in dismissal.
Lyuda
This business is voluntary, it is not allowed to force them. But I would have done
Working as a kindergarten teacher, do I have the right not to get a flu shot?
Answers:
~ Prorok_Leo ~
Yes, are not they firing for this?! . You can not put the vaccine.. . (no comments, post office)
Anastasia Tsygankova
no
6 Massi
Tell that the body does not tolerate vaccinations against the flu, that you are sick after the vaccinations are strong) not everyone is getting vaccinated
Ermek
of course not
Alex
does not.
and in general an inoculation against influenza - crap.
vaccinated from one "type" of influenza, and the epidemic can cause a completely different. so that the vaccinated will fall ill.
Nicholas 578
The state policy in the field of immunoprophylaxis is aimed at preventing, limiting the spread and eliminating infectious diseases. For many categories of people, vaccination against infections is a mandatory procedure. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15.07.1999. № 825 approved a list of works, the implementation of which is associated with a high risk of infectious diseases and requires mandatory conduct of preventive vaccinations. According to the list it is inadmissible, in particular, to work without prior immunization for people working in all types and types of educational institutions.
In accordance with the Federal Law of 17.09.1998. No. 157-FZ "On the immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases", in the absence of preventive vaccinations in the period of the emergence of mass infectious diseases or at threat of occurrence of epidemics temporary refusal in reception of citizens in educational and improving establishments is possible. Article 76 of the Labor Code allows the employer to exclude from work in the absence of preventive vaccinations those employees whose activities are connected, for example, with a high risk of infectious diseases.
If teachers refuse to vaccinate against the flu, the employer, at the request of bodies and officials authorized by federal laws and other regulatory legal acts (for example, at the request of the bodies of the State Sanitary Epidemiological Service) may temporarily suspend the work of persons who are bacterial carriers and which may be the source of the spread of infectious diseases. The employee is not allowed to work for the entire period of time until the circumstances eliminating the grounds for exclusion from work or exclusion to work are eliminated. At the same time, wages are not accrued to him, except for cases stipulated by federal laws.
Thus, teachers who refused to be vaccinated can be temporarily suspended by the head of the post.
Responsibility for the heads of educational institutions for the refusal of workers from vaccination is not provided.
Pauline
http://www.privivkam.net/iv/viewtopic.ph? =9195
this is a written waiver
dyan mendelevich
To exclude from work for the period of seasonal epidemic-has the right
Is it right that employees of educational institutions MUST get vaccinated against swine flu?
Answers:
Anastasia Kutysheva
found a letter like this.. .
"This year we were faced with a situation when some teachers refused to vaccinate against the flu, referring to the personal right of everyone to decide on the need for vaccinations. A rather complicated conflict situation arose. Please clarify whether there are legislative arguments in the need for immunization for educators. Will the principal be held responsible for the fact that the teachers refused to vaccinate against the flu? "
The last argument for convincing teachers of the need for their vaccination is the possibility of "punishment by the ruble".
The state policy in the field of immunoprophylaxis is aimed at preventing, limiting the spread and eliminating infectious diseases. For many categories of people, vaccination against infections is a mandatory procedure. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15.07.1999. № 825 approved a list of works, the implementation of which is associated with a high risk of infectious diseases and requires mandatory conduct of preventive vaccinations. According to the list it is inadmissible, in particular, to work without prior immunization for people working in all types and types of educational institutions.
In accordance with the Federal Law of 17.09.1998. No. 157-FZ "On the immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases", in the absence of preventive vaccinations in the period of the emergence of mass infectious diseases or at threat of occurrence of epidemics temporary refusal in reception of citizens in educational and improving establishments is possible. Article 76 of the Labor Code allows the employer to exclude from work in the absence of preventive vaccinations those employees whose activities are connected, for example, with a high risk of infectious diseases.
If teachers refuse to vaccinate against the flu, the employer, at the request of bodies and officials authorized by federal laws and other regulatory legal acts (for example, at the request of the bodies of the State Sanitary Epidemiological Service) may temporarily suspend the work of persons who are bacterial carriers and which may be the source of the spread of infectious diseases. The employee is not allowed to work for the entire period of time until the circumstances eliminating the grounds for exclusion from work or exclusion to work are eliminated. At the same time, wages are not accrued to him, except for cases stipulated by federal laws.
Thus, teachers who refused to be vaccinated can be temporarily suspended by the head of the post.
Responsibility for the heads of educational institutions for the refusal of workers from vaccination is not provided.
"Educational Law"
REFUSAL FROM VACCINATION IS ONLY IF ANTITANEOUS VACCINES... .
__________________
Technical support
To us, too, came... I did not do it!! and still had a row with them!! did not want to refuse even to take, they directly forced us! !
We have many who refused, but did not send anywhere and there were no fines)
Narsel
Of course not. It's your right not to get vaccinated. And about fines is generally nonsense. How suckers are bred to get the "sticks".
Ruslan Kartoev
I would consider this an insult, if you do not work in a pig, then how can you infect swine with the flu? and fined for refusing to vaccinate, it can not and the enterprise is also of course if it is not a pigsty and this sister is not a pig send it to a country with an Islamic religion, let him try to offer me this vaccination, it is very interesting for me to see how she will look after this proposal PRIVET
Inga
you are not some kind of doctor, but your director is obligated to OFFER to get vaccinated. For the state. score
Igor Shein
There is no wrong, but you also have no right not to give her a written refusal.
Nina Lutoeva
I just get out of this situation. I am the director of the school and I was REDUCED by the Rospotrebnadzor. 17 people out of 54 are vaccinated, the rest refused. So the written refusals were not taken into account, they say, but where the medical attendants, only this is respectful. I was charged that in the epidemic period in such cases unvaccinated should be removed. It's true.
...
In our school, absolutely all parents do not give their consent not to have the flu vaccinated for their children. So we will test them on the teachers, we will force them. But it's pointless. Children still get sick and infect each other. What does the teacher have to do with it? I believe that it is one thing - to vaccinate once for a lifetime, as, for example, from measles. And doing every year can be dangerous. I have a cat so from sarcoma postvaccinal died, every year in the withered graft, there and grew malignant. Especially since the impact of the vaccine against the flu on the body has not yet been investigated. This is a relatively new vaccine, and began to massively promote it recently. It is not known how it will turn up in the future, if every year to prick.
Is it necessary to get a flu shot? I work in the school. What articles should I refer to?
Answers:
Maria Shelest
Dear Elena Ivanovna.
IN YOUR OCCASION, YOU CAN NOT REFUSE FROM VACCINATION ONLY IF ANTITANEOUS VACCINES ...
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15.07.1999. № 825 approved a list of works, the implementation of which is associated with a high risk of infectious diseases and requires mandatory conduct of preventive vaccinations. According to the list it is inadmissible, in particular, to work without prior immunization for people working in all types and types of educational institutions.
http://www.zaki.ru/pagesnew.ph? d=10558
In accordance with the Federal Law of 17.09.1998. No. 157-FZ "On immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases" http://www.signorita.ru/doc_334.htm, in the absence of preventive vaccinations in the period of origin mass infectious diseases or when there is a threat of epidemics, temporary denial of admission of citizens to educational and health institutions is possible.
Article 76 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation http://tk.jobin.ru/542/articles.html allows the employer to remove from work in the absence of preventive vaccinations of those employees whose activities are connected, for example, with a high risk of infectious diseases.
If teachers refuse to vaccinate against the flu, the employer, at the request of bodies and officials authorized by federal laws and other regulatory legal acts (for example, at the request of the bodies of the State Sanitary Epidemiological Service) may temporarily suspend the work of persons who are bacterial carriers and which may be the source of the spread of infectious diseases. The employee is not allowed to work for the entire period of time until the circumstances eliminating the grounds for exclusion from work or exclusion to work are eliminated. At the same time, wages are not accrued to him, except for cases stipulated by federal laws.
Thus, teachers who refused to be vaccinated can be temporarily suspended by the head of the post.
Responsibility for the heads of educational institutions for the refusal of workers from vaccination is not provided.
But, as you know, under a recumbent stone.. .And therefore the opponents of vaccinations give their arguments with reference to the legislation. Please see them here.
[link is blocked by the decision of the project administration]
http://www.ksv.ru/Execute / Black / Health / Health_12.shtml
And from myself.. . I personally do not recognize any inoculations invading my immune system!
Oksana Smirnova
what articles? this is the choice of everyone. I do not put to myself a child
Elena Shumova
to put or not to put-above business. I would have put them, the kids are carrying each other all winter long ...
Dimasss
I do not put myself, I think that they only undermine health
Regina Denisova
cm. THE DECISION of July 15, 1999. N 825 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE LIST OF WORKS, IMPLEMENTATION OF WHICH HAS BEEN CONNECTED TO THE HIGH RISK OF DISEASE BY INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND REQUIRES MANDATORY CARRIAGE OF PROPHYLAXIAL WAVES, 12,
Your work is included in this list, according to the calendar of preventive vaccinations for epidemiological indications, you MUST make yourself a free vaccine against influenza
cm. FZ ON IMMUNOPROPHYLACTICS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES of September 17, 1998 No. 157-FZ, ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION of June 27, 2001. N 229
ABOUT THE NATIONAL CALENDAR OF PROPHYLACTIC WAVES AND CALENDAR OF PROPHYLACTIC DISPLACEMENTS ON EPIDEMIC INDICATIONS (in red. Orders of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation of January 17, 2006 No. 27, of 11 January 2007 N 14, of 30 October 2007 N 673, of 09/04/2009, No. 166)
Do kindergarten teachers need to get a flu shot? Or at will?
Answers:
* Predator *
Personally, I work voluntarily at work
Unknown
optional!
olga grishina
With the permission of the parents!
Anton
Neither a fig is optional. When vaccines appear in the city, first of all they are introduced to all employees who are in one way or another connected with children or are managers: educators, teachers, teachers in universities.
Iren
Any vaccination is voluntary
Natalia
All teachers. teachers, sellers and other people working in contact with people should be vaccinated on a mandatory basis.
oxana
a nurse in general, and with the written permission of the parents.
Alexander Morozov
Voluntarily. At us so
Alina Ivanova
And if he has an allergy, or a very bad physical condition, chronic tonsillitis, for example? Who will force him?
Can I be required to get a flu shot? At work threatened with dismissal (I work as a teacher at school).
Answers:
r n
Are you afraid of injections?
aaa bbb
complain to the bank
[Email protected] `
According to the LC RF h. 1 tbsp. 76 the employer is obliged to remove from work (not to work) the employee in cases provided for by federal laws and other normative legal acts of the Russian Federation.
On the basis of p. 2 tbsp. 5 of the Federal Law of 17.09.1998 N 157-FZ "On the immunization of infectious diseases" the absence of preventive vaccinations entails denial of reception of citizens for work or removal of citizens from work, the performance of which is associated with a high risk of infectious diseases.
At the same time, a list of works that are associated with a high risk of infectious diseases and requires mandatory carrying out preventive vaccinations, is established by the federal executive body authorized by the Government of the Russian Federation.
According to para. 12 The list of works, the implementation of which is associated with a high risk of infectious diseases and requires the mandatory conduct of preventive vaccinations, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15.07.1999 N 825, these works include work in all types and types of educational institutions.
Based on h. 2 tbsp. 76 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, the employer removes (does not allow to work) an employee for the entire period of time up to Elimination of circumstances that were grounds for dismissal from work or non-admission to work.
Given the above, the refusal of a preventive vaccination against influenza by an OS employee is possible only if there are medical contraindications. The list of medical contra-indications for carrying out preventive vaccinations is approved by the federal executive body for health.
VHS
the question is really very controversial.. despite the fact that there is a resolution and there is a vaccination calendar. but a keyword on EPIDEMIOLOGICAL INDICATIONS. If the epidemic in your area is not officially announced, then you need to try to appeal
